Research Article
Print
Research Article
A new species of Ninia (Serpentes, Colubridae) from western Ecuador and revalidation of N. schmidti
expand article infoAlejandro Arteaga§, Kyle J. Harris|
‡ Khamai Foundation, Quito, Ecuador
§ Tropical Herping S.A., Quito, Ecuador
| Liberty University, Lynchburg, United States of America
Open Access

Abstract

We describe a new species of Ninia Baird & Girard, 1853 endemic to the cloud forests of northwestern Ecuador. The new species has previously been confused with N. atrata (Hallowell, 1845) and N. teresitae (Angarita-Sierra and Lynch 2017) but is genetically most closely related to a third species of Ninia endemic to the Chocoan–Tumbesian transition area of western Ecuador. We revalidate the name N. schmidti (Jan, 1862), designate a neotype, and provide a diagnosis of the taxon and a description of its hemipenial morphology based on new material. The new and revalidated species can easily be identified from one another and from other trans-Andean South American Ninia based on ventral and subcaudal scale counts, hemipenial morphology, and coloration of the supralabials, throat, and belly. Finally, we remove N. atrata from the herpetofaunal list of Ecuador.

Key Words

Dipsadidae, coffee snakes, snake, Squamata, taxonomy

Introduction

The Variable Coffee Snake Ninia atrata, as currently understood, is a small blackish snake widely distributed throughout the lowlands and adjacent foothills of the Andes in northern South America, including much of western Ecuador (Angarita-Sierra 2009; Ingrasci 2011). Aptly named, the Variable Coffee Snake exhibits remarkable intraspecific variation in coloration, squamation, and morphometrics, notably in the shape and color of the nuchal collar (Angarita-Sierra 2009). Much of what is accepted about the current limits and variation within this species was presented in the seminal work on the snakes of the genus Ninia by Dunn (1935), who considered that only one species of Ninia inhabited South America. Later, Parker (1940), Burger and Werler (1954), and more recently, Angarita-Sierra (2009, 2014, 2018), Ingrasci (2011), and Angarita-Sierra and Lynch (2017), have challenged this view and provided evidence that northern South America is inhabited by more species of coffee snakes, all previously subsumed under N. atrata, now accepted to be a species complex.

The Ninia atrata complex also occurs in Ecuador, where at least two names other than N. atrata were applied to specimens now subsumed under this complex: Streptophorus sebae schmidti Jan, 1862 and N. spilogaster Peters, 1881. The holotype of S. sebae schmidti (deposited at ZMH) is labeled as having originated from Guayaquil, Guayas province, but is now destroyed (Jakob Hallermann, pers. comm. to AA). The type locality of Ninia spilogaster is “Ecuador” and the holotype (presumably at Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin; ZMB) could not be located (Mark-Oliver Rödel, pers. comm. to AA). Two additional names were erected for snakes in this group, Streptophorus drozii Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854 and Streptophorus lansbergi Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854, with holotypes MNHN-RA 3444 from “La Nouvelle-Orléans” and MNHN-RA 3446 from Caracas, respectively. Dunn (1935) considered these names to be synonyms of N. atrata. Thus, until 2018, only two species were recognized in Ecuador: N. atrata west of the Andes and N. hudsoni (Parker, 1940) east of the Andes. Using characters of coloration, lepidosis, and hemipenial morphology, Angarita-Sierra (2018) demonstrated that many specimens previously labeled as N. atrata from the Chocó biogeographic region in western Ecuador corresponded to N. teresitae, a trans-Andean species from Colombia (Angarita-Sierra and Lynch 2017). However, the N. atrata puzzle in Ecuador was not fully solved. The limits of Ecuadorian populations of N. atrata were not examined using molecular characters and populations occurring in the cloud forests or along the Chocoan-Tumbesian transition area were not examined.

Here, we attempt to fill-in this information gap by providing a systematic review of the unsampled populations using both molecular and morphological characters. As a result, we describe a new species of Ninia endemic to the cloud forests of northwestern Ecuador, revalidate the name N. schmidti, and remove N. atrata from the herpetofaunal list of Ecuador.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

This study was carried out in strict accordance with the guidelines for use of live amphibians and reptiles in field research (Beaupre et al. 2004) compiled by the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists (ASIH), the Herpetologists’ League (HL) and the Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles (SSAR). All procedures with animals (see below) were reviewed by the Ministerio del Ambiente, Agua y Transición Ecológica (MAATE) and specifically approved as part of obtaining the following field permits for research and collection: MAE-DNB-CM-2018-0105 and MAATE-DBI-CM-2022-0245 (granted to Universidad San Francisco de Quito). Specimens were euthanized with 20% benzocaine, fixed in 10% formalin or 90% ethanol, and stored in 70% ethanol. Voucher specimens were deposited at Museo de Zoología de la Universidad San Francisco de Quito (ZSFQ). Specimens labeled JMG, SC, SCA, TH, and THI were also deposited at ZSFQ.

Morphological data and collection acronyms

Terminology for Ninia cephalic shields follows Angarita-Sierra (2009), diagnoses and descriptions generally follow Angarita-Sierra and Lynch (2017), and ventral and subcaudal counts follow Dowling (1951). We examined fluid-preserved specimens from the herpetology collections at Zoologisches Museum Hamburg (ZMH), Fundación Herpetológica Gustavo Orcés (FHGO), and Museo de Zoología de la Universidad San Francisco de Quito (ZSFQ) (Suppl. material 1). Abbreviations are as follows: caudal length (CL); head length (HL); head width (HW); snout-vent length (SVL); total length (TL).

Preparation of hemipenial morphology

The hemipenes were removed and prepared from museum specimens using the procedures of Pesantes (1994) and Zaher (1999). Hemipenial terminology is based on Dowling and Savage (1960), Zaher (1999), and Myers and MacDowell (2014).

Sampling and laboratory techniques

Genomic DNA was extracted from 96% ethanol-preserved tissue samples (liver, muscle, or scales) using either a guanidinium isothiocyanate extraction protocol (Peñafiel et al. 2020) or a modified salt precipitation method based on the Puregene DNA purification kit (Gentra Systems). The nucleotide sequences of the primers and the PCR conditions applied to each primer pair are detailed in Appendix 1. PCR products were cleaned with either ExoSAP-IT (Affymetrix, Cleveland, OH) or Exonuclease I and Alkaline Phosphatase (Illustra ExoProStar by GE Healthcare) before they were sent to Macrogen Inc (Seoul, South Korea) for Sanger sequencing. All PCR products were sequenced in both forward and reverse directions with the same primers that were used for amplification. We generated sequence data for samples marked with an asterisk in Suppl. material 2. The sequences were deposited in GenBank and the accession numbers are listed in Suppl. material 2.

DNA phylogenetic analyses

A total of 49 DNA sequences were used to build a phylogenetic tree of the genus Ninia, of which 37 were generated during this work and 12 were downloaded from GenBank. Of these, 15 sequences are 418–776 bp long fragments of the 16S gene, 13 are 313–775 bp long fragments of the CYTB gene, 12 are 585–647 bp long fragments of the ND4 gene, and 10 are 795 bp long fragments of the RAG1 gene. New sequences were edited and assembled using the program Geneious ProTM 2021.1.1 (Drummond et al. 2021) and aligned with those downloaded from Genbank (Suppl. material 2) using MAFFT v.7 (Katoh and Standley 2013) under the default parameters. Gene fragments were concatenated into a single matrix with 10 partitions, one per non-coding gene and three per protein coding gene corresponding to each codon position. The best partition strategies along with the best-fit models of evolution were obtained in PartitionFinder 2.1.1 (Lanfear et al. 2016) under the Bayesian Information Criterion.

Phylogenetic relationships were assessed under a Bayesian inference (BI) approach in MrBayes 3.2.0 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2013). Four independent analyses were performed to reduce the chance of converging on a local optimum. Each analysis consisted of 6,666,667 generations and four Markov chains with default heating settings. Trees were sampled every 1,000 generations and 25% of them were arbitrarily discarded as ‘‘burn-in.” The resulting 5,000 trees saved per analysis were used to calculate the posterior probabilities (PP) for each bipartition in a 50% majority-rule consensus tree. We used Tracer 1.6 (Rambaut et al. 2022) to assess convergence and effective sample sizes (ESS) for all parameters. Additionally, we verified that the average standard deviation of split frequencies between chains and the potential scale reduction factor (PSRF) of all the estimated parameters approached values of ≤ 0.01 and 1, respectively.

Distribution maps and ecological niche models

We present ranges of occurrence for the three species of Ninia known to occur in western Ecuador. Presence localities are derived from museum vouchers (Suppl. material 1), photographic records (iNaturalist), and the literature (all summarized in Suppl. material 3). For each species, both a binary environmental niche model (ENM) and a dot map is presented. These ENMs estimate potential areas of distribution based on observed presences and a set of environmental predictors (Elith and Leathwick 2009). To delimit the occupancy areas and the potential species distribution, we used the BAM diagram proposal (Soberón and Peterson 2005; Peterson et al. 2011). To create the models, we used presence localities listed in Suppl. material 3,19 bioclimatic variables from Worldclim 1.4 (Hijmans et al. 2005), and Maxent 3.4.1k, an algorithm based on the principle of maximum entropy (Phillips et al. 2006; Elith et al. 2011; Renner and Warton 2013).

For the first explorative exercise, we used the 19 climate layers from the WorldClim project and assessed which variables were the most important for the model, according to the Jackknife test calculated in MaxEnt (Royle et al. 2012). Correlated environmental variables (r < 0.8) were identified using the PEARSON correlation test of PAST 3. In a second modelling exercise, we used the locality records for each species and the variables identified in the first approach to generate the species distribution. 5,000 iterations were specified to the program with clamping and no extrapolation. All other parameters in MaxEnt were maintained at default settings. To create the binary environmental niche models, suitable areas were distinguished from unsuitable areas by setting a minimum training presence threshold value. The logistic format was used to obtain the values for habitat suitability (continuous probability from 0 to 1), which were subsequently converted to binary presence-absence values based on the established threshold value, defined herein as the minimum training presence. The convergence threshold was set to 10-5, maximum iterations to 500, and the regularization parameter to “auto.”

Rationale for definition of species-level candidate taxa

We here recognize species limits following an integration by congruence approach (Padial et al 2010) based on the intersection of evidence from three or more independent taxonomic characters. We follow the general species concept of de Queiroz (2007) in defining species as independent evolutionary if two or more independent lines of evidence support their distinctness. We start the species delimitation procedure by seeking mitochondrial clades divergent from other mitochondrial clades by sequence divergences > 3% in a 700 bp fragment of the CYTB gene, given that this degree of divergence has been found to correspond to species-level units in other Ninia, such as the species pairs N. atrataN. hudsoni (Ingrasci 2011). We then tested if the individuals belonging to these mitochondrial lineages can be unambiguously diagnosed based on: (1) lepidosis; (2) hemipenial morphology; (3) coloration; and (4) size. Finally, we evaluated if these mitochondrial lineages are congruent geographically. Thus, in our species delimitation approach, we consider groups of individuals as species if they (1) form a monophyletic group based on mtDNA; (2) differ from other such groups by > 3% sequence divergence (mean p-distance); (3) are diagnosable based on external characters of coloration and lepidosis; (4) are diagnosable based on hemipenial morphology; and (5) are congruent ecologically and biogeographically.

Results

Molecular phylogeny

Selected partitions and models of evolution are presented in Table 2. We consider strong support for a clade when Bayesian analyses yield posterior probability values > 95%, following Felsenstein (2004). The topology and support (Fig. 1) of our phylogenetic tree renders Ninia atrata as paraphyletic with respect to all other included Ninia species.

Figure 1.

Phylogenetic relationships within Ninia inferred using a Bayesian inference and derived from analysis of DNA gene fragments 16S, CYTB, ND4, and RAG1. Support values on intra-specific branches are not shown for clarity. Voucher numbers for sequences are indicated for each terminal. Black dots indicate clades with posterior probability values from 95–100%. Grey dots indicate values from 70–94%. White dots indicate values from 50–69% (values <50% not shown). Colored clades correspond to the species’ distribution presented in Fig. 2.

The sample of Ninia atrata from the lowlands of the Río Magdalena valley in Caldas department in Colombia (MHUA 14452) is strongly supported as sister to all other Ninia species included. Ninia maculata (Peters, 1861) is the moderately supported sister species of a clade that includes the remainder congeners. The two included samples of N. teresitae (one from Colombia, MHUA 15130, and one from Ecuador, KU 218424) form a monophyletic group (red clade in Figs 1 and 2) sister to the members of the N. atrata complex. The Ecuadorian sample of N. hudsoni is recovered as sister to the two cis-Andean samples of N. atrata. A species of Ninia endemic to southwestern Ecuador (purple clade) is the strongly supported sister taxon of another new species endemic to the cloud forests of northwestern Ecuador (yellow clade).

Figure 2.

Distribution of species of Ninia in western Ecuador. Black symbols represent type localities. Each colored area is a geographic representation of the suitable environmental conditions for one of the clades recovered in the phylogeny of Fig. 1.

We restrict the name Ninia schmidti comb. nov. to the purple clade in Fig. 1, which includes samples from throughout the species area of distribution, based on the type locality of Streptophorus sebae schmidti: Guayaquil, where no other member of the genus is known to occur. ZMH R10390, housed also at the Zoologisches Museum Hamburg, is from the type locality and morphologically resembles the other seven specimens referred to this taxon (Suppl. material 1) in having ventral surfaces obscured by dark brown pigment particularly along the posterior edge of each ventral scale and throat and chin shields obscured by dark brown pigment. This description is not shared by members of the yellow clade but is present in members of N. teresitae. However, the low number of subcaudals (=46) and the locality of ZMH R10390 rules out allocation to that taxon. To further clarify this association and to bring stability to the taxonomy of Ninia in Ecuador, we designate ZMH R10390 as the neotype of N. schmidti comb. nov.

Systematic accounts

Species delimitation and the distinction between species-level and intraspecific variation is a complex topic (Carstens et al. 2013; Burbrink et al. 2022). In this instance, we name and provide descriptions only for species that are monophyletic in our molecular phylogeny and share diagnostic features of their coloration pattern, lepidosis, and biogeography. Future studies might elucidate species boundaries based on explicit species-delimitation analyses. Based on these delimitation criteria, which follow the general lineage species concept of de Queiroz (2007), we describe a new species of Ninia and revalidate N. schmidti comb. nov.

Ninia guytudori sp. nov.

Figs 3, 4a, 5a–d, 6, 7b

Holotype

JMG 1327 (Figs 3, 4a, 5a–b), adult female collected by Alejandro Arteaga on July 27, 2017 at road to Mindo, Pichincha province, Ecuador (-0.02825, -78.76189; 1676 m).

Figure 3.

Female holotype of Ninia guytudori sp. nov. JMG 1327 in (a) dorsal and (b) ventral view.

Figure 4.

Lateral views of the head in two species of Ninia: (a) N. guytudori sp. nov. JMG 1327; (b) N. schmidti comb. nov. TH 503.

Figure 5.

Dorsal and lateral views of the head in two species of Ninia: (a, b) N. guytudori sp. nov. JMG 1327; (c, d) N. guytudori sp. nov. SC 005; (e, f) N. schmidti comb. nov. SC 095; (g, h) N. schmidti comb. nov. SCA 1374.

Paratopotype

SC 005 (Fig. 5c, d), juvenile male with the same data as the holotype.

Proposed standard English name

Tudors’s Coffee-Snake.

Proposed standard Spanish name

Culebra cafetera de Tudor.

Diagnosis

Ninia guytudori sp. nov. is placed in the genus Ninia, as diagnosed by Dunn (1935), based on phylogenetic evidence (Fig. 1). The species is diagnosed based on the following combination of characters: (1) 19/19/19 keeled dorsals; (2) two postoculars or none in SC 005; (3) loreal 1.6–1.7 × longer than high; (4) temporals 1+2; (5) seven or eight supralabials, usually fourth and fifth contacting orbit; (6) seven or eight infralabials, first four or five contacting chin shields; (7) two rows of chin shields; (8) two or three preventrals; (9) 130–138 ventrals in males, 144 in the single female; (10) 48–51 subcaudals in males, 44 in the single female; (11) dorsal ground color uniformly black with a white nuchal collar that connects to a white lip band forming a bridle (Fig. 6); (12) ventral surfaces uniformly immaculate white (Fig. 3b); (13) 181–243 mm SVL in males, 183 mm in the single female; (14) 30–58 mm CL in males, 35 in the single female.

Figure 6.

Photographs of some specimens of Ninia guytudori sp. nov. in life: (a) from Río Manduriacu Reserve, Imbabura province; (b) from Santa Lucía Cloud Forest Reserve, Pichincha province. Photos by Jose Vieira.

Comparisons

Ninia guytudori sp. nov. is compared to other species of the genus previously subsumed under N. atrata sensu lato (differences summarized in Table 1). The new species differs from all of them by having a white nuchal collar merged with the white lip coloration (Fig. 4a), immaculate throat and chin shields (Fig. 5b, d), and ventral surface of body immaculate white (Fig. 3b). In N. schmidti comb. nov., the throat and chin shields are obscured by dark brown pigment (Fig. 5f, h), the supralabials are partly or entirely black or dark gray (Fig. 4b), nuchal collar absent in adults (Fig. 5e, g), and ventral surfaces usually heavily obscured by dark pigment. Ninia guytudori sp. nov. further differs from N. teresitae by having a lower number of ventrals in males (130–138 vs 143–156), presence of a “white bridle,” and belly not irregularly spotted, speckled, or heavily obscured by dark pigment. The cis-Andean N. hudsoni has black lips and dorsal scales arranged in 21 or 23 rows at mid-body (Suppl. material 1; Camper et al. 2021). Ninia guytudori sp. nov. differs from trans-Andean populations of N. atrata by having a white (instead of red, orange, or yellow) nuchal collar (Angarita-Sierra 2009), ventral surface of tail obscured by dark gray pigment (instead of uniformly cream; Angarita-Sierra and Lynch 2017), nasal divided, and by having the sulcate surface of the hemipenial body ornamented with a large basal hooked spine (photo of QCAZR 11960 depicted in Guerra-Correa 2020).

Table 1.

Differences in coloration, scale counts, and size between snakes of the genus Ninia inhabiting western Ecuador. The range of each continuous variable is from our own sample, Angarita-Sierra and Lynch (2017), and Angarita-Sierra (2018). The numbers in parentheses represent the sample size.

Variable Ninia guytudori sp. nov. Ninia schmidti comb. nov. Ninia teresitae
Throat and chin shields Immaculate Obscured by dark brown pigment Irregularly spotted
Supralabials White (juveniles) or white with faint dark speckling Partly or entirely black or dark gray Partly or entirely black or dark gray
Nuchal collar in adults Present, entirely white or suffused with dark speckling Absent; if present, obscured by dark smudges and spots Absent
Nuchal collar in juveniles White, immaculate, connected with white supralabials, creating a “bridle” Present, with black spots White with black spots, no “bridle”
Supralabials White (juveniles) or white with faint dark speckling Partly or entirely black or dark gray; dingy white in ZMH R10390 Partly or entirely black or dark gray
Ventral surfaces of body Immaculate white Immaculate to heavily obscured by dark pigment Irregularly spotted, speckled, or heavily obscured by dark pigment
Pocket-shaped structure at the base of the hemipenial body Absent Absent Present
Sex Males (n = 4) Females (n = 1) Males (n = 4) Females (n = 4) Males (n = 10) Females (n = 15)
Maximum SVL 243 mm 183 mm 283 mm 409 mm 382 mm 346 mm
Ventral scales 130–138 138 138–144 139–155 143–156 148–160
Subcaudal scales 48–51 44 50–57 46–53 57–69 53–63
Table 2.

Partition scheme and models of evolution used in phylogenetic analyses. Numbers in parentheses indicate codon position.

Partition Best model Gene regions Number of aligned sites
1 GTR+I 16S, CYTB(3), ND4(1), RAG1(1) 1517
2 HKY+I CYTB(1), ND4(2), RAG1(2) 740
3 HKY+G CYTB(2), ND4(3) 453
3 K80 RAG1(3) 285
Figure 7.

Lateral views of some specimens of Ninia from western Ecuador in life: (a) N. schmidti comb. nov. SCA 1446 from Buenaventura Reserve, El Oro province; (b) Ninia guytudori sp. nov. from Santa Lucía Cloud Forest Reserve, Pichincha province. Photos by Jose Vieira.

Description of holotype

Subadult female, 218 mm TL; 35 mm CL; 183 mm SVL; CL/SVL ratio 0.19; head distinct from body; HL 11.4 mm; HW 6.6 mm; rostral wider than high; internasals wider than long (1.2 × 0.6 mm); internasal suture 0.6 mm; prefrontals longer than internasals, as wide as long (1.9 × 1.9 mm; suture 1.9 mm); frontal U-shaped and as long as wide (2.6 × 2.6 mm); parietals longer than wide (4.1 × 2.2 mm); interparietal suture 2.7 mm; supraoculars 1/1, each longer than wide (1.2 × 0.8 mm), entering orbit and contacting postocular; nasal scales 2/2 where anterior nasal scale contacts internasal, rostral, first supralabial, and posterior nasal in contact with loreal, prefrontal, internasal, first and second supralabials; loreal single, longer than high (1.7 × 1.1 mm), entering orbit and in contact with 2nd and 3rd supralabials; postoculars 2/2; temporal formulae 1+2, anterior temporal scale 1.4× longer than lower posterior temporal; anterior temporal in contact with 5th and 6th supralabials; supralabials 7/8; 3rd–4th or 4th and 5th entering orbit, 5th in contact with postocular; infralabials 7/8, 1st–4th/1st–5th in contact with two pairs of chin shields; dorsal scales in 19/19/19 rows, keeled, strongly striated, lacking apical pits; ventrals 138; divided subcaudals 44; cloacal plate undivided.

Natural history

Specimens of Ninia guytudori sp. nov. have been found active at night on leaf-litter in old-growth cloud forest. During the daytime, they have been found hidden under rotten logs. When threatened, individuals flatten the body and tail (Fig. 8b).

Figure 8.

Dorsal views of some specimens of Ninia from western Ecuador in life: (a) N. schmidti comb. nov. SCA 1446 from Buenaventura Reserve, El Oro province; (b) Ninia guytudori sp. nov. from Santa Lucía Cloud Forest Reserve, Pichincha province. Photos by Jose Vieira.

Distribution

Ninia guytudori sp. nov. is endemic to an estimated area of 3,432 km2 along the Pacific slopes of the Andes in northwestern Ecuador. The species is known from 11 localities (listed in Suppl. material 3) and has been recorded at elevations 1190–1676 m above sea level (Fig. 2).

Etymology

The specific epithet guytudori is a patronym honoring Guy Tudor, an all-around naturalist and scientific illustrator with a deep fondness for birds and all animals, in recognition of the impact he has had on the conservation of South America’s birds through his artistry. For many years, Tudor and Bob Ridgely partnered in the preparation of numerous well-regarded volumes on the Neotropical avifauna.

Conservation status

We consider Ninia guytudori sp. nov. to be included in the Near Threatened conservation category following the IUCN criteria (IUCN 2012), because the species has been recorded in more than 10 localities (listed in Suppl. material 3) and it is distributed over an area which retains the majority (~53%) of its forest cover (MAE 2012). Therefore, the species is facing no major immediate extinction threats. However, some populations are likely to be declining due to deforestation by logging and large-scale mining, especially in the province Imbabura (Guayasamin et al. 2019), where only two populations of the species are known.

Ninia schmidti (Jan, 1862), comb. nov.

Figs 4b, 5e–h, 7a, 8a, 9, 10, 11, 12

Streptophorus sebae schmidti Jan, 1862: 27. Holotype ZMH (destroyed), from Guayaquil.

Ninia spilogaster Peters, 1881: 49. Holotype ZMB (not located), from Ecuador.

Neotype

ZMH R10390 (Fig. 9), adult female collected by Bi. Jansen between 1901 and 1902 at Guayaquil, Guayas province, Ecuador.

Figure 9.

Adult female neotype of Ninia schmidti comb. nov. ZMH R10390 in (a) dorsal and (b) ventral view. Photos by Jakob Hallermann.

Proposed standard English name

Schmidt’s Coffee-Snake.

Proposed standard Spanish name

Culebra cafetera de Schmidt.

Diagnosis

Ninia schmidti comb. nov. is placed in the genus Ninia, as diagnosed by Dunn (1935), based on phylogenetic evidence (Fig. 1). The species is diagnosed based on the following combination of characters: (1) 19/19/19 keeled dorsals; (2) two postoculars; (3) loreal 1.4–2.3 × longer than high; (4) temporals 1+2; (5) seven supralabials, third and fourth contacting orbit; (6) seven or eight infralabials, first four or five contacting chin shields; (7) usually two rows of chin shields; (8) one or two preventrals; (9) 138–144 ventrals in males, 139–155 in females; (10) 50–57 subcaudals in males, 46–53 in females; (11) dorsal ground color uniformly black without a white nuchal collar (Fig. 10); (12) ventral surfaces of adults obscured with dark pigment particularly along the posterior edge of each ventral scale (Figs 9b, 11a), immaculate white in some juveniles (Fig. 11b); (13) 167–283 mm SVL in males, 230–409 mm in females; (14) 42–61 mm CL in males, 53–84 mm in females.

Figure 10.

Dorsolateral views of some specimens of Ninia schmidti comb. nov. in life: (a) SCA 1446 from Buenaventura Reserve, El Oro province; (b) TH-503 from Vía a Tembelé, Bolívar province.

Figure 11.

Ventral views of some specimens of Ninia schmidti comb. nov. in life: (a) SCA 1374B from Buenaventura Reserve, El Oro province; (b) SCA-1374 from Buenaventura Reserve, El Oro province.

Comparisons

Ninia schmidti comb. nov. is compared to other species of the genus previously subsumed under N. atrata sensu lato (differences summarized in Table 1). The new species differs from most of them (particularly from N. guytudori sp. nov.) by having ventral surfaces obscured by dark brown pigment particularly along the posterior edge of each ventral scale (Figs 9b, 11a), throat and chin shields obscured by dark brown pigment (Fig. 5f, h), supralabials partly or entirely black or dark gray (dingy white in ZMH R10390), and white nuchal collar in adults absent (Figs 4a, 5e, g) or faint and obscured by dark pigment (ZMH R10390). This species resembles N. teresitae, from which it differs by having a lower number of subcaudals and by lacking a pocket-like structure at the base of the hemipenial body (Table 1). The cis-Andean N. hudsoni has an immaculate white belly and dorsal scales arranged in 21 or 23 rows at mid-body (Suppl. material 1; Camper et al. 2021). Ninia schmidti comb. nov. differs from trans-Andean populations of N. atrata by lacking a nuchal collar in adults, ventral surface of tail obscured by dark gray pigment (instead of uniformly cream; Angarita-Sierra and Lynch 2017), nasal divided, and by having the sulcate surface of the hemipenial body ornamented with a large basal hooked spine (Fig. 12).

Figure 12.

Hemipenial architecture of Ninia schmidti comb. nov. in sulcate, lateral, and asulcate views: (a) SCA 1374 from Buenaventura Reserve, El Oro province; (b) SCA 1446 from Buenaventura Reserve, El Oro province.

Hemipenial morphology

(n = 2; Fig. 12) Everted and inflated, the organ is cylindrical, weakly bilobed, semicalyculate and capitate. Sulcus spermaticus centrifugal, bifurcate and with walls strongly defined, bifurcation occurs proximal to the midpoint of the hemipenial body; sulcus spermaticus branch runs to lobe tips; capitation crotch located just above the bifurcation point of sulcus spermaticus (sulcate side). Region between capitation groove and lobe tips as well as entire intrasulcar region of the globular lobes homogenously ornamented with small calyces and densely packed spines. In sulcate view, base of hemipenial body surface with minute mesial spinules, but otherwise lacking medium-sized hooks. In lateral and asulcate views, base of hemipenial body covered with 2–5 rows of medium-sized hooked-shaped spines arranged in an inverted “V” pattern and one large basal hook larger than any other spine on the hemipenial body; hooks replaced below by minute spicules towards the base of the organ.

Description of neotype

Adult female, 283 mm TL; 53 mm CL; 230 mm SVL; CL/SVL ratio 0.23; head distinct from body; HL 12.5 mm; HW 7.4 mm; rostral wider than high; internasals wider than long (1.4 × 0.9 mm); internasal suture 0.9 mm; prefrontals longer than internasals, as wide as long (2.3 × 2.3 mm; suture 2.1 mm); frontal shield-shaped and wider than long (2.8 × 2.6 mm); parietals longer than wide (4.0 × 2.5 mm); interparietal suture 2.4 mm; supraoculars 1/1, each longer than wide (1.3 × 0.9 mm), entering orbit and contacting postocular; nasal scales 2/2 where anterior nasal scale contacts internasal, rostral, first supralabial, and posterior nasal in contact with loreal, prefrontal, internasal, first and second supralabials; loreal single, longer than high (1.7 × 1.2 mm), entering orbit and in contact with 2nd and 3rd supralabials; postoculars 2/2; temporal formulae 1+1, anterior temporal scale 2× longer than posterior temporal; anterior temporal in contact with 4th to 7th supralabials; supralabials 7, 3rd–4th entering orbit, 5th in contact with postocular; infralabials 8, 1st–5th in contact with one pair of chin shields; dorsal scales in 19 rows, keeled, strongly striated, lacking apical pits; ventrals 144; divided subcaudals 46; cloacal plate undivided.

Natural history

Specimens of Ninia schmidti comb. nov. have been found active at night on leaf-litter in old-growth to heavily disturbed evergreen lowland forest and seasonally dry forests. Regdy Vera (pers. comm. to AA) reports that in Manabí province, this species is common under leaf-litter in humid soil and under fallen trunks, particularly in cacao plantations. In captivity, SC 095 consumed earthworms and leeches, but rejected slugs and land flatworms of the family Geoplanidae. This specimen laid a clutch of two eggs. Field observations by Vera suggest that this species does not tolerate dry, open areas.

Distribution

Ninia schmidti comb. nov. is endemic to an estimated area of 42,281 km2 along the Chocoan–Tumbesian transition area in western Ecuador. The species is known from 8 localities (listed in Suppl. material 3) and has been recorded at elevations 46–1843 m above sea level (Fig. 2).

Etymology

The specific epithet schmidti is a patronym honoring Philipp Moses Paul Frederich Schmidt (1800–1869/1873), a physician in Hamburg best known for his work on sea snakes (Beolens et al. 2011).

Conservation status

We consider Ninia schmidti comb. nov. to be included in the Near Threatened conservation category following the IUCN criteria (IUCN 2012) because the species’ extent of occurrence is estimated to be greater than the 20,000 km2 threshold needed to qualify for the Vulnerable category. Unfortunately, out of the eight localities where N. schmidti comb. nov. is known to occur, two represent historical populations and five are of singleton individuals. The species occurs as fragmented populations and occurs over an area where most (~80%) of the forest cover has been transformed into plantations and human settlements (MAE 2012). Therefore, N. schmidti comb. nov. may qualify for a threatened category soon if its habitat continues to be destroyed. Fortunately, the species occurs in one protected area: Buenaventura Reserve.

Discussion

This work marks the second attempt elucidating the identities of Ecuadorian snakes labeled as Ninia atrata. It provides evidence of the existence of three species of Ninia in western Ecuador, none of which can be allocated to N. atrata sensu stricto based on molecular evidence and color pattern characteristics. Thus, we remove the latter species from the list of Ecuadorian herpetofauna. We propose to use the name Ninia schmidti comb. nov. over N. spilogaster, simply based on priority. We agree with Dunn (1935), that both names correspond to the same taxon based on the description of N. spilogaster by Peters (1881), in which he mentions a darkened ventral coloration and lack of a white nuchal collar. We suggest that the status of Streptophorus drozii and S. lansbergi as synonyms of N. atrata sensu stricto be maintained pending a more detailed study of Venezuelan populations.

The distribution of the three species of Ninia in western Ecuador mirrors the distribution of other trans-Andean squamates in the country. For example, N. teresitae is a strictly Chocoan snake species and its distribution resembles that of other snakes endemic to this biome (MECN 2010). The distribution of N. guytudori sp. nov. corresponds with lower-montane forests in the area between the Río Mira and Toachi valleys, the area in Ecuador where these two vegetation zones are wider and closer to the Equatorial line. Ninia guytudori sp. nov. can be included in the list of species that share this pattern (Arteaga et al. 2016). Ninia schmidti comb. nov. shares it distribution with other reptiles that are restricted to the transition area between the humid Chocó rainforests and the Tumbesian dry forests, including Enyalioides touzeti Torres-Carvajal et al. 2008, Anadia buenaventura Betancourt et al., 2018, Dipsas bobridgelyi Arteaga et al., 2018, Sibon bevridgelyi Arteaga et al., 2018, and Anolis nemonteae Ayala-Varela et al., 2021. We believe this shared pattern suggest the existence of a unique biogeographical province between the humid Chocó rainforests and the Tumbesian dry forests.

We suggest that based on the number of locality records included in the analyses (Suppl. material 3), the environmental niche models and corresponding distribution areas (Fig. 2) for the three species of Ninia occurring in western Ecuador are in themselves diagnostic and ecologically informative. We found no sympatry between the sister species Ninia schmidti comb. nov. and Ninia guytudori sp. nov., suggesting a pattern of allopatric speciation.

Although this work advances our knowledge on Ecuadorian Ninia, it is still far from complete. First, the paraphyly of N. atrata still needs to be resolved, including the status of trans-Andean populations assigned to this species. Second, the hemipenial morphology of N. guytudori sp. nov. has not been described in detail. Third the relationship between Ecuadorian N. hudsoni and those from the type locality (Guyana) is still uncertain, but worthy of study, particularly since populations of this species throughout the Amazon are known to be discontinuous.

We suggest that any future work focused on the systematics of the Ninia atrata species complex include a comprehensive sampling of molecular characters. Such work would gain much clarity by sampling species of Ninia occurring on the Guianas and along the Río Magdalena valley in Colombia. Until then, we hope that our work helps guide future studies into the biogeography of this charismatic group of colubrids.

Author contributions

Conceived and designed the work: AA. Performed the analyses: AA. Gathered morphological data: AA, KJH. Analyzed the data: AA. Wrote the paper: AA, KJH.

Acknowledgments

This article was greatly improved by comments of Jakob Hallermann, Teddy Angarita-Sierra, Claudia Koch, Günther Köhler, and Alexander Haas. We are indebted to Duván Zambrano for suggesting that populations of Ninia in southwestern Ecuador were probably not N. atrata and to Regdy Vera for providing information about N. schmidti comb. nov. in Manabí province. Thanks to Juan M Guayasamin (Laboratorio de Biología Evolutiva, USFQ) for providing lab infrastructure, reagents, and personnel time. Images of living specimens were created by Jose Vieira (ExSitu Project). For providing photographs, morphological data, and scale counts of the neotype of N. schmidti comb. nov., we are grateful to Jakob Hallermann (ZMH). Amanda Quezada prepared and photographed the hemipenes of N. schmidti comb. nov. For granting access to the protected forests under their care, we are grateful to Martin Schaefer and David Agro of Fundación Jocotoco. Juan Manuel Daza (MHUA) provided DNA sequence data of Ninia. Special thanks to Jose Vieira, Duván Zambrano, Frank Pichardo, Amanda Quezada, and Eric Osterman for their assistance and companionship in the field. Daniela Franco and Gabriela Gavilanes provided invaluable assistance in accessioning material at ZSFQ and generating DNA sequence data; Lorena Benitez created the topographical maps. Fieldwork was made possible with the support of Robert Ridgely and Walter Jennings (Fundación Jocotoco), Khamai Foundation, Liberty University, and Tropical Herping. Sequencing was made possible with support of the Inédita Program from the Ecuadorian Science Agency SENESCYT (Respuestas a la Crisis de Biodiversidad: La Descripción de Especies como Herramienta de Conservación; INEDITA PIC-20-INE-USFQ-001).

References

  • Angarita-Sierra T (2014) Hemipenial morphology in the semifossorial snakes of the genus Ninia and a new species from Trinidad, West Indies (Serpentes: Dipsadidae). South American Journal of Herpetology 9: 114–130. https://doi.org/10.2994/SAJH-D-12-00004.1
  • Angarita-Sierra T (2018) Range expansion in the geographic distribution of Ninia teresitae (Serpentes: Dipsadidae): new localities from northwestern Ecuador. Herpetology Notes 11: 357–360.
  • Angarita-Sierra T, Lynch JD (2017) A new species of Ninia (Serpentes: Dipsadidae) from Chocó-Magdalena biogeographical province, western Colombia. Zootaxa 4244: 478–492. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4244.4.2
  • Arévalo E, Davis SK, Sites JW (1994) Mitochondrial DNA-sequence divergence and phylogenetic relationships among eight chromosome races of the Sceloporus grammicus complex (Phrynosomatidae) in Central Mexico. Systematic Biology 43: 387–418. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/43.3.387
  • Arteaga A, Pyron RA, Peñafiel N, Romero-Barreto P, Culebras J, Bustamante L, Yánez-Muñoz MH, Guayasamin JM (2016) Comparative phylogeography reveals cryptic diversity and repeated patterns of cladogenesis for amphibians and reptiles in northwestern Ecuador. PLoS ONE 11: e0151746. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151746
  • Arteaga A, Salazar-Valenzuela D, Mebert K, Peñafiel N, Aguiar G, Sánchez-Nivicela JC, Pyron RA, Colston TJ, Cisneros-Heredia DF, Yánez-Muñoz MH, Venegas PJ, Guayasamin JM, Torres-Carvajal O (2018) Systematics of South American snail-eating snakes (Serpentes, Dipsadini), with the description of five new species from Ecuador and Peru. ZooKeys 766: 79–147. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.766.24523
  • Ayala-Varela F, Valverde S, Poe S, Narváez AE, Yánez-Muñoz MH, Torres-Carvajal O (2021) A new giant anole (Squamata: Iguanidae: Dactyloinae) from southwestern Ecuador. Zootaxa 4991: 295–317. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4991.2.4
  • Baird SF, Girard C (1853) Catalogue of North American reptiles in the Museum of the Smithsonian Institution. Part 1. Serpentes. Smithsonian Institute, Washington, 172 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.5513
  • Barlow A, Pook CE, Harrison RA, Wüster W (2009) Coevolution of diet and prey-specific venom activity supports the role of selection in snake venom evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276: 2443–2449. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.0048
  • Beaupre SJ, Jacobson ER, Lillywhite HB, Zamudio K (2004) Guidelines for use of live amphibians and reptiles in field and laboratory research. American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, Lawrence, 43 pp.
  • Betancourt R, Reyes-Puig C, Lobos SE, Yánez-Muñoz MH, Torres-Carvajal O (2018) Sistemática de los saurios Anadia Gray, 1845 (Squamata: Gymnophthalmidae) de Ecuador: límite de especies, distribución geográfica y descripción de una especie nueva. Neotropical Biodiversity 4: 82–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/23766808.2018.1487694
  • Burbrink FT, Lawson R, Slowinski JB (2000) Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of the polytypic North American rat snake (Elaphe obsoleta): A critique of the subspecies concept. Evolution 54(6): 2107–2188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb01253.x
  • Burbrink FT, Crother BI, Murra CM, Smith BT, Ruane S, Myers EA, Pyron RA (2022) Empirical and philosophical problems with the subspecies rank. Ecology and Evolution 12: e9069. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9069
  • Burger WL, Werler JE (1954) The subspecies of the ring-necked coffee snake Ninia diademata, and a short biological and taxonomic account of the genus. The University of Kansas Science Bulletin 36: 643–672.
  • Camper JD, Torres-Carvajal O, Ron SR, Nilsson J, Arteaga A, Knowles TW, Arbogast BS (2021) Amphibians and reptiles of Wildsumaco Wildlife Sanctuary, Napo Province, Ecuador. Check List 17: 729–751. https://doi.org/10.15560/17.3.729
  • Dowling HG (1951) A proposed standard system of counting ventrals in snakes. British Journal of Herpetology 1: 97–99.
  • Dowling HG, Savage JM (1960) A guide to the snake hemipenis: a survey of basic structure and systematic characteristics. Zoologica 45: 17–28. https://doi.org/10.5962/p.203350
  • Drummond AJ, Ashton B, Buxton S, Cheung M, Cooper A, Heled J, Kearse M, Moir R, Stones-Havas S, Sturrock S, Thierer T, Wilson A (2021) Geneious version 2021.1. https://www.geneious.com
  • Duméril AMC, Bibron G, Duméril AHA (1854) Erpétologie générale ou Histoire Naturelle complète des Reptiles. Librairie Encyclopédique de Roret, Paris, 780 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.45973
  • Felsenstein J (2004) Inferring phylogenies. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, 664 pp.
  • Guayasamin JM, Cisneros-Heredia DF, Vieira J, Kohn S, Gavilanes G, Lynch RL, Hamilton PS, Maynard RJ (2019) A new glassfrog (Centrolenidae) from the Chocó-Andean Río Manduriacu Reserve, Ecuador, endangered by mining. PeerJ 7: e6400. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6400
  • Guerra-Correa E (2020) Ninia teresitae. In: Torres-Carvajal O, Pazmiño-Otamendi G, Salazar-Valenzuela D (Eds) Reptiles del Ecua­dor. Version 2022.0. Museo de Zoología, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador. [accessed on 2023-09-09]
  • Hallowell E (1845) Descriptions of reptiles from South America, supposed to be new. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 2: 241–247.
  • Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 25: 1965–1978. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1276
  • Ingrasci MJ (2011) Molecular systematic of the Coffee snakes, genus Ninia (Colubridae: Dipsadinae). MSc Thesis, University of Texas at Arlington, 127 pp.
  • IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List categories and criteria: Version 3.1. Second edition. IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland and Cambridge, 32 pp.
  • Jan G (1862) Enumerazione sistematico delle specie d’ofidi del gruppo Calamaridae. Archive per la Zoologia, l’Anatomia et la Fisiologia 2: 1–76.
  • Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010
  • Lanfear R, Frandsen PB, Wright AM, Senfeld T, Calcott B (2016) PartitionFinder 2: new methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34: 772–773. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw260
  • MAE (2012) Línea base de deforestación del Ecuador continental. Ministerio del Ambiente del Ecuador, Quito, 30 pp.
  • MECN (2010) Serie herpetofauna del Ecuador: El Chocó esmeraldeño. Museo Ecuatoriano de Ciencias Naturales, Quito, 232 pp.
  • Myers CW, McDowell SB (2014) New taxa and cryptic species of neotropical snakes (Xenodontinae), with commentary on hemipenes as generic and specific characters. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 385: 1–112. https://doi.org/10.1206/862.1
  • Palumbi SR, Martin A, Romano S, McMillan WO, Stice L, Grabowski G (1991) The simple fool’s guide to PCR, version 2.0. University of Hawaii, Honolulu, 94 pp.
  • Peñafiel N, Flores DM, Rivero De Aguilar J, Guayasamin JM, Bonaccorso E (2020) A cost-effective protocol for total DNA isolation from animal tissue. Neotropical Biodiversity 5: 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/23766808.2019.1706387
  • Royle JA, Chandler RB, Yackulic C, Nichols JD (2012) Likelihood analysis of species occurrence probability from presence-only data for modelling species distributions. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3: 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00182.x
  • Soberón J, Peterson TA (2005) Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species’ distributional areas. Biodiversity Informatics 2: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.17161/bi.v2i0.4
  • Torres-Carvajal O, Almendáriz A, Valencia J, Yánez-Muñoz M, Reyes JP (2008) A new species of Enyalioides (Iguanidae: Hoplocercinae) from southwestern Ecuador. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 48: 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0031-10492008002000001
  • Zaher H (1999) Hemipenial morphology of the South American xenodontine snakes, with a proposal for a monophyletic Xenodontinae and a reappraisal of Colubroid hemipenis. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 240: 1–168.

Appendix 1

Table A1.

List of PCR and sequencing primers and their respective PCR conditions (denaturation, annealing, extension and number of corresponding cycles) used in this study. All PCR protocols included an initial 3-min step at 94 °C and a final extension of 10 min at 72 °C.

Locus Primer Sequence (5’-3’) Reference PCR profile:
16S 16Sar-L CGCCTGTTTATCAAAAACAT Palumbi et al. (1991) 94 °C (45 sec), 53 °C (45 sec), 72 °C (1 min) [×30]
16Sbr-H-R CCGGTCTGAACTCAGATCACGT
Cytb L14910 GACCTGTGATMTGAAAACCAYCGTTGT Burbrink et al. (2000) 94 °C (1 min), 58 °C (1 min), 72 °C (2 min) [×30–36]
H16064 CTTTGGTTTACAAGAACAATGCTTTA
ND4 ND4 CACCTATGACTACCAAAAGCTCATGTAGAAGC Arévalo et al. (1994) 94 °C (25 sec), 56 or 60 °C (1 min), 72 °C (2 min) [×25–30]
Leu CATTACTTTTACTTGGATTTGCACCA
RAG-1 MartFL1 AGCTGCAGYCARTAYCAYAARATGTA Barlow et al. 2009 95 °C (30 sec), 55 °C (45 sec), 72 °C (1 min) [×35]
AmpR1 AACTCAGCTGCATTKCCAATRTCA

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1 

Morphological and locality data

Alejandro Arteaga, Kyle J. Harris

Data type: xlsx

Explanation note: Morphological and locality data for specimens of Ninia examined, either directly or indirectly through digital photographs. Codes: SVL = snout-vent length, CL = Caudal length, M = Male, F = Female.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (66.28 kb)
Supplementary material 2 

GenBank accession numbers

Alejandro Arteaga, Kyle J. Harris

Data type: xls

Explanation note: GenBank accession numbers for loci and terminals of taxa and outgroups sampled in this study. Novel sequence data produced in this study are marked with an asterisk (*).

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (33.50 kb)
Supplementary material 3 

Locality data used to create distribution maps

Alejandro Arteaga, Kyle J. Harris

Data type: xlsx

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (16.85 kb)
login to comment