Research Article |
|
Corresponding author: João Marcelo S. Abreu ( joaabreu@hotmail.com ) Academic editor: Danilo Harms
© 2025 João Marcelo S. Abreu, Wellington Silva Pedroza, Osvaldo T. Oyakawa, Solange de Araújo Melo, Ligia Tchaicka, Nivaldo Magalhães Piorski.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Abreu JMS, Silva Pedroza W, Oyakawa OT, de Araújo Melo S, Tchaicka L, Piorski NM (2025) A new species of Hoplias malabaricus species complex (Characiformes, Erythrinidae) from Northeastern Brazil. Evolutionary Systematics 9(1): 135-143. https://doi.org/10.3897/evolsyst.9.153695
|
A new species of Hoplias malabaricus species complex is herein described from the Munim River Basin, Maranhão state, Northeastern of Brazil. Hoplias cazumba differs from its congeners by the following combination of characters: 19–22 scales around caudal peduncle, 40–42 lateral-line scales, 39–41 vertebrae, 11–13 dorsal-fin rays and, always 15 caudal-fin rays.
Uma nova espécie do complexo de espécies Hoplias malabaricus é descrita aqui, proveniente da Bacia do Rio Munim, estado do Maranhão, Nordeste do Brasil. Hoplias cazumba difere de seus congêneres pela seguinte combinação de caracteres: 19–22 escamas ao redor do pedúnculo caudal, 40–42 escamas na linha lateral, 39–41 vértebras, 11–13 raios na nadadeira dorsal e sempre 15 raios na nadadeira caudal.
Biodiversity, freshwater fish, Maranhão, Neotropical, Trahira
Biodiversidade, Maranhão, Neotropical, Peixe de água doce, Traíra
The family Erythrinidae is a group of Characiformes widely distributed in Neotropics with 17 valid living species belonging to three genera, Erythrinus Scopoli, 1777, Hoplerythrinus Gill, 1896 and Hoplias Gill, 1903 (
The H. lacerdae group is defined by the absence of teeth on the basihyal and basibranchials bones and the medial margins of contralateral dentaries lying almost parallel to each other, forming a U shape margin in ventral view (
Currently, H. malabaricus group comprises the following species: H. malabaricus (Bloch, 1794), Hoplias microlepis (Günther, 1864); Hoplias teres (Valenciennes, 1847); Hoplias mbigua Azpelicueta, Benítez, Aichino & Mendez, 2015; Hoplias misionera Rosso, Mabragaña, González-Castro, Delpiani, Avigliano, Schenone & Díaz de Astarloa, 2016; Hoplias argentinensis Rosso, González-Castro, Bogan, Cardoso, Mabragaña, Delpiani & Díaz de Astarloa, 2018 and Hoplias auri Guimarães, Rosso, González-Castro, Souza, Díaz de Astarloa & Rodrigues, 2021.
The existence of cryptic lineages in the H. malabaricus species complex has been known to the ichthyologists since the 1970s. After several morphological, molecular and chromosomal studies, the diversity of H. malabaricus species group remains unresolved, mainly due to its conservative morphological characters (
Some studies carried out in recent years with samples from the Maranhão Hydrological Unit (MHU) indicated the existence of several lineages and possible new species of Hoplias for the region (
In the last years, there has been a focused effort to understand the process responsible for the distribution and diversification of ichthyofauna of MHU (
Traditional measurements and counts were made on the left side of the body following
Information about congeners was based on examined material (see comparative material section) and literature (
Hoplias argentinensis: Brazil – Paraná •
Hoplias mbigua: Brazil – Mato Grosso • MCP37703, 1, 152.44 mm SL; municipality of Poconé, Arroio na estrada BR070, Paraguai River basin. – Paraná • NUP22509, 1, 181 mm SL; municipality of Francisco Alves, Bagre River, Paraná River basin.
Hoplias malabaricus: Brazil – Bahia •
Hoplias cf. malabaricus: Brazil – Maranhão • CPUFMA3083, 3, 140.18–152.57 mm SL; municipality of São Luís, Maracanã River, Bacanga River basin; x-rays (2). • CPUFMA1588, 4, 184.01–292.5 mm SL; municipality of Centro Novo do Maranhão, Rebio Gurupi, Ponema River, Gurupi River basin; x-rays (3). • CPUFMA613, 4, 191.42–249.11 mm SL; municipality of Mirador, Mirador State Park, Itapecuru River, Itapecuru River basin; x-rays (4). • CPUFMA2222, 3, 192.42–224.68 mm SL; municipality of Penalva, Igarapé Arineu, Mearim River basin; x-rays (2). • CPUFMA1202, 6, 138.17–151.61 mm SL; municipality of Viana, Viana Lake, Mearim River basin; x-rays (4). • CPUFMA3629, 4, 114.75–133.28 mm SL; municipality of Santa Quitéria, Parnaíba River, Parnaíba River basin; x-rays (3). • CPUFMA3630, 1, 178.16 mm SL; municipality of Santa Quitéria, Parnaíba River, Parnaíba River basin; x-rays (1). • CPUFMA888, 1, 259.89 mm SL; municipality of Balsas, Balsas River, Parnaíba River basin. • CPUFMA1417, 1, 117.6 mm SL; municipality of Santo Amaro,Alegre River, Periá River basin; x-rays (1). • CPUFMA030, 1, 175.67 mm SL; municipality of Barreirinhas, Queimada dos Britos, Preguiças River basin. • CPUFMA031, 1, 128 mm SL; municipality of Barreirinhas, Preguiças River, Preguiças River basin; x-rays (1). • CPUFMA2299, 1, 159.6 mm SL; municipality of Barreirinhas, Sucuriju River, Preguiças River basin; x-rays (1). • CPUFMA132352, 2, 211.14–213.04 mm SL; municipality of Barreirinhas, Preguiças River basin; x-rays (1). • CPUFMA1862, 2, 240.65–290.02 mm SL; municipality of Barreirinhas, Preguiças River basin. • CPUFMA1204, 5, 178.33–205.63 mm SL; Quebra-pote Lake, municipality of Santa Helena, Turiaçu River basin; x-rays (3).
Hoplias misionera: Brazil – Paraná • NUP22510, 2, 150.51–158.55 mm SL; municipality of Francisco Alves, Bagre River, Paraná River basin.
Hoplias teres: Venezuela •
Hoplias curupira: Brazil – Pará • CPUFMA172259, 1, 148.59 mm SL; municipality of Bom Jesus do Tocantins, Jacundá River, Tocantins River basin. • CPUFMA172266, 1, 252.64 mm SL; municipality of Bom Jesus do Tocantins, Jacundá River, Tocantins River basin.
Hoplias intermedius: Brazil – Paraná • NUP857, 2, 235.05–237.29 mm SL; municipality of Campo Mourão, Ivaí River, Paraná River basin.
Hoplias sp.: Brazil – Pará •
Hoplias malabaricus
–
Holotype : Brazil • MZUSP130388, 193.43 mm SL; Maranhão, municipality of Chapadinha, Povoado Cedro, Munim River basin; 03°51'34"S, 43°19'33"W; 27 Nov. 2010; J.S. Nunes leg.
Hoplias cazumba, holotype, MZUSP130388, 193.43 mm SL, Povoado Cedro, Munim River basin, municipality of Chapadinha, Maranhão, Brazil.
Paratypes : Brazil – Maranhão • MZUSP130389, 6, 141.61–214.78 mm SL; municipality of Chapadinha, Povoado Cedro, Munim River basin; collected with holotype. • MCP55320, 10, 152.32–240.83 mm SL; municipality of Chapadinha, Povoado Cedro, Munim River basin; 03°51'34"S, 43°19'33"W, 25 May 2011, J.S. Nunes leg.
Details of head of Hoplias cazumba sp. nov. a. Ventral view of dentary of holotype; b, c. S&C individual showing details of tooths.
Non-types : Brazil – Maranhão • CPUFMA2121, 3, 152.4–284.17 mm, SL; municipality of Chapadinha, Povoado Cedro, Munim River basin; 03°51'34"S, 43°19'33"W, 7 to 8 Jul. 2011, J.S. Nunes leg. • CPUFMA1600, 9; municipality of Chapadinha, Povoado Cedro, Munim River basin; 03°51'34"S, 43°19'33"W, 25 May 2011, J.S. Nunes leg.
Hoplias cazumba is distinguished from other species, except H. malabaricus species-group by medial margins of contralateral dentaries converging to midline forming a V or Y-shaped angle in ventral view. H. cazumba can be distinguished from H. malabaricus by the number of dorsal-fin rays (11–13 vs. 14), number of caudal-fin rays (15 vs. 14–15), number of lateral-line scales (39–41; mode 40 vs. 38–39) and the number of scales around caudal peduncle (19–22 vs. 18). Hoplias cazumba can be distinguished from H. teres by the number of pre-dorsal scales (15–17 vs. 18), number of scales around caudal peduncle (19–22 vs. 18), number of vertebrae (39–41 vs. 42), greater snout length (25.3%–29.8% vs. 21.9–23.1% of HL), lower snout width (21.4%–26.8% vs. 29.4%–29.5% of HL) and lower snout depth (14.8%–21.1% vs. 24.4%–26.6% of HL). Hoplias cazumba can be distinguished from H. microlepis by the number of pre-dorsal scale (15–17; mode 15 vs. 17–19), number of lateral-line scales (39–41 vs. 43–47), longitudinal series of scales between lateral line and pelvic-fin origin (4–5 vs. 5.5–6.5), number of scales around caudal peduncle (19–22; mode 20 vs. 22–24), and the number of vertebrae (39–41 vs. 42–45), also, lower caudal peduncle length (8.3%–12.2% vs. 12.4%–16% of SL) and lower snout depth (14.8%–21.1% vs. 22.9%–29.2% of HL). Hoplias cazumba can be distinguished from H. mbigua by the number of lateral-line scales (39–41 vs. 42–43), number of vertebrae (39–41 vs. 42) and a greater anal-fin (15.2%–18.9% vs. 11.9%–16.6% of SL) and dorsal-fin length (28.5%–33.4% vs. 14.6%–19.1% of SL). Hoplias cazumba can be distinguished from H. misionera by the number of dorsal-fin rays (11–13 vs. 14–16), number of caudal-fin rays (15 vs. 15–18), greater snout length (25.2–29.8% vs. 20.5–24.7% of HL) and pre-nasal length (16%–20.2% vs. 12.5%–16.2% of HL). Hoplias cazumba can be distinguished from H. argentinensis by the number of anal-fin rays (8–10; mode 9 vs. 7–8), number of caudal-fin rays (15 vs. 17–19), number of pre-dorsal scale (15–17; mode 15 vs. 17–19) and number of vertebrae (39–41 vs. 42–43). Hoplias cazumba can be distinguished from H. auri by the number of anal-fin rays (8–10; mode 9 vs. 7–8), number of caudal-fin rays (15 vs. 12–15) and number of lateral-line scales (39–41; mode 40 vs. 37–39).
Morphometric and meristic data are summarized in Tables
Morphometric data of Hoplias cazumba sp. nov. Standard length in mm; values 1–14 in percents of standard length; values 15–22 in percents of head length. SD, standard deviation; n, number of specimens; Range includes the holotype.
| Holotype | n | Mean | Min | Max | SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Length | 193.43 | 20 | 152.4 | 141.61 | 284.17 | 32.4 | |
| 1 | Body depth | 22.5 | 20 | 21.6 | 17.3 | 24.5 | 1.7 |
| 2 | Head length | 31.1 | 20 | 31.5 | 27.6 | 32.8 | 1.1 |
| 3 | Pectoral-fin length | 16.9 | 20 | 17.0 | 15.7 | 18.0 | 0.6 |
| 4 | Pelvic-fin length | 18.0 | 19 | 18.4 | 16.6 | 20.8 | 1.0 |
| 5 | Anal-fin length | 18.2 | 20 | 17.5 | 15.2 | 18.9 | 1.0 |
| 6 | Dorsal-fin length | 29.0 | 20 | 31.1 | 28.5 | 33.4 | 1.3 |
| 7 | Dorsal-fin base | 18.1 | 20 | 17.9 | 16.0 | 20.5 | 1.1 |
| 8 | Anal-fin base | 9.5 | 20 | 8.6 | 7.1 | 10.8 | 1.0 |
| 9 | Pre-pectoral length | 29.0 | 20 | 28.8 | 26.5 | 30.3 | 0.9 |
| 10 | Pre-pelvic length | 54.1 | 20 | 54.3 | 51.6 | 57.6 | 1.5 |
| 11 | Pre-dorsal length | 49.9 | 20 | 49.2 | 45.9 | 51.6 | 1.6 |
| 12 | Pre-anal length | 78.8 | 20 | 80.3 | 75.0 | 86.1 | 2.4 |
| 13 | Caudal peduncle depth | 13.4 | 20 | 12.9 | 11.6 | 13.5 | 0.5 |
| 14 | Caudal peduncle length | 9.5 | 20 | 10.0 | 8.3 | 12.2 | 1.3 |
| 15 | Head Depth | 52.0 | 20 | 49.3 | 46.9 | 52.8 | 1.6 |
| 16 | Snout length | 27.8 | 20 | 27.4 | 25.2 | 29.8 | 1.4 |
| 17 | Snout width | 26.8 | 20 | 23.4 | 21.4 | 26.8 | 1.3 |
| 18 | Snout Depth | 17.8 | 20 | 17.2 | 14.8 | 21.1 | 1.5 |
| 19 | Pre-nasal length | 19.6 | 20 | 18.4 | 16.0 | 20.2 | 1.2 |
| 20 | Orbital diameter | 17.5 | 20 | 16.8 | 15.0 | 19.3 | 1.1 |
| 21 | Interorbital width | 26.1 | 20 | 26.1 | 24.3 | 29.1 | 1.2 |
| 22 | Upper jaw length | 53.2 | 20 | 54.3 | 51.0 | 57.3 | 1.7 |
| Meristic | Holotype | n | Min | Max | Mode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unbranched dorsal fin rays | ii | 20 | i | ii | ii |
| 2 | Branched dorsal fin rays | 12 | 20 | 11 | 13 | 12 |
| 3 | Unbranched anal fin rays | i | 20 | i | ii | i |
| 4 | Branched anal fin rays | 9 | 20 | 8 | 10 | 9 |
| 5 | Unbranched pectoral fin rays | ii | 20 | i | ii | ii |
| 6 | Branched pectoral fin rays | 11 | 20 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
| 7 | Unbranched pelvic fin rays | i | 20 | i | ii | i |
| 8 | Branched pelvic fin rays | 7 | 20 | 6 | 8 | 7 |
| 9 | Unbranched caudal fin rays | ii | 20 | ii | ii | ii |
| 10 | Branched caudal fin rays | 15 | 20 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| 11 | Scales between pectoral and pelvic fins | 4 | 20 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
| 12 | Scales between pelvic and anal fins | 5 | 19 | 3 | 6 | 5 |
| 13 | Predorsal scales | 15 | 20 | 15 | 17 | 15 |
| 14 | Lateral line scales | 40 | 20 | 39 | 41 | 40 |
| 15 | Scales above lateral line | 5 | 20 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
| 16 | Scales below lateral line | 5 | 20 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| 17 | Scales around caudal peduncle | 21 | 20 | 19 | 22 | 20 |
| 18 | Laterosensory canal pores of the dentary | 4 | 20 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| 19 | Laterosensory canal pores of the preopercle | 6 | 20 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| 20 | Laterosensory canal pores of the infraorbitals total | 11 | 20 | 10 | 12 | 11 |
| 21 | Laterosensory canal pores of the infraorbital 1 | 3 | 20 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 22 | Laterosensory canal pores of the infraorbital 2 | 3 | 20 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 23 | Laterosensory canal pores of the infraorbital 3 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 24 | Laterosensory canal pores of the infraorbital 4 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 25 | Laterosensory canal pores of the infraorbital 5 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 26 | Laterosensory canal pores of the infraorbital 6 | 3 | 20 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
| 27 | Laterosensory canal pores of the dorsal surface of the head | 10 | 20 | 9 | 12 | 10 |
| 28 | Laterosensory canal pores of the nasal bone | 2 | 20 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| 29 | Laterosensory canal pores of the frontal bone | 4 | 20 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
| 30 | Laterosensory canal pores of the pterotic bone | 1 | 20 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 31 | Laterosensory canal pores of the supraoperculum bone | 2 | 20 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 32 | Vertebra | 40 | 11 | 39 | 41 | 40 |
Conical and caniniform teeth in both jaws covered by lips skin the largest with skin flaps of the same shape covering its labial and lingual faces. Premaxillary teeth row divided in two sections. The first section starts with the larger canine, followed by two decreasing in size teeth, to reach a gap The second starts with three increasing in size teeth, followed by two decreasing in size. A single row of maxillary bone teeth, the first five increasing in size, followed by 45 smaller. Posterior portion of the maxilla with a large dorsal projection.
Two rows of dentary teeth. The first one with five small teeth displayed in a more lingual position, leaving a free space ahead, between teeth and lips to fit the larger symphyseal premaxillary tooth. Following, the two largest teeth of lower jaw, the largest onefits in the premaxillary gap, trespassing the bone to reach a foramen. After, five small teeth of equal size in a more lingual position leave a free space ahead, to fit the larger tooth of premaxillary Than, a sequence of eight teeth alternating in size. The second row is an aligned sequence of 22 same size small teeth in a more lingual position starting right next to the first row end. Buccal face of accessory ectopterygoid and ectopterygoid with series of small conical teeth aligned along anterior edge and many smaller villiform teeth in a patch covering the bone surfaces.
Dorsal-fin origin placed at midbody 2–3 scales anterior to vertical through pelvic fin origin. Dorsal-fin rays i-12 (1), i-13 (1), ii-11 (2), ii-12* (14) or ii-13 (2), [mode: ii, 12]. Tip of longest ray of depressed dorsal fin extending at or slightly beyond vertical through anus. Anal-fin rays i-8 (1), i-9* (11), i-10 (2), ii-8 (3) or ii-9 (3), [mode: i, 9]. Pectoral-fin rays i-11 (1), i-12 (2), ii-10 (1), ii-11* (6), ii-12 (9) or ii-13 (1), [mode: ii, 12]. The tip of pectoral fin separated from pelvic-fin origin 3 (2), 4* (10), or 5 (8) scales, [mode: 4]. Pelvic-fin rays i-7* (18), i-8 (1) or ii-6 (1), [mode: i, 7]. Tip of pelvic fin separated from vertical through anus by 3 (3), 4 (5), 5* (8) or 6 (3) scales, [mode: 5]. Total caudal-fin rays 17 (i-15-i). Pre-dorsal scales 15* (15), 16 (3) or 17 (2) in irregular series, [mode: 15].
Lateral line with 39 (8), 40* (10) or 41 (2) perforated scales, [mode: 40], with 1 or 2 unperforated scales anteriorly and located beneath opercle membrane. Longitudinal series of scales between dorsal-fin origin and lateral line 4 (1), 5* (16) or 6 (3), [mode: 5]. Longitudinal series of scales between lateral line and pelvic-fin origin 4 (6) or 5* (14), [mode: 5]. Longitudinal series of scales around caudal peduncle 19 (3), 20* (14), 21 (2) or 22 (1), [mode: 20]. Latero-sensory canal along ventral surface of dentary with four (19) pores. Latero-sensory canal with 5 (3) or 6* (17) pores in preopercle, [mode: 6]. Latero-sensory canal along infraorbitals with 10 (2), 11* (14) or 12 (4) pores, [mode: 11]. Infraorbital 1: 2 (2) or 3* (18) pores, [mode: 3], infraorbital 2: 2 (1) or 3* (19) pores, [mode: 3], infraorbital 3: 1* (20) pore, infraorbital 4: 1* (20) pore, infraorbital 5 lacking pores and infraorbital 6 with 3* (16) or 4 (4) pores, [mode: 3]. Latero-sensory system of dorsal surface of head with 9 (1), 10* (11), 11 (6) or 12 (2) pores, [mode: 10]. Nasal bone: 2* (19) or 3 (1) pores, [mode: 2], frontal bone: 3 (1), 4* (18) or 5 (1) pores, [mode: 4], pterotic bone: 1* (11) or 2 (8) pores, [mode: 1]. One pore between parietal bones, on the posterior end of suture. Total vertebrae 39 (4), 40* (6) or 41 (1), [mode: 40].
Ground coloration of head and body dark to light brown, darker dorsally and paler ventrally. Approximately five to six lateral chevron-shaped blotches, irregularly spaced with distance between subsequent blotches gradually decreasing towards caudal peduncle. Some specimens have a completely dark head and others have a darker dorsal part than the ventral part. Patch of dark brown pigmentation covering entire mid-ventral of opercular bone. Latero-ventral surface of dentaries with transverse brown bands or blotches. Dorsal, anal and caudal fins light brown, lighter than body, with dark spots on rays and interradial membranes forming pattern of irregular dark stripes. Pectoral and pelvic fins with dark spots or a dark brown roundish spot covering almost the entire fin, darker than body.
The village of Cedro is located about 15 km from the center of Chapadinha, on the banks of the Munim River. In this location, the surrounding vegetation is mainly composed of medium-sized trees and shrubs, such as Senna alata, Inga sp., Mimosa caesalpiniaefolia, Ipomea sp., Astrocaryum ssp., Bactris spp. and Orbignya spp.
The specific name cazumba, a noun in apposition, refers to the Cazumba, a mythical creature of the bumba-meu-boi, a Maranhão folklore character. The Cazumba is a character represented by a mythical creature with a big and strange head, that protects the nature. The word cazumba has its origins in the word cazumbi from the Kimbundu linguistic group and means little spirit.
Herein, we described a new species belonging to the H. malabaricus species group, based on morphological and morphometric characters. This new species is endemic to the Munim Basin in Northeastern Brazil. Hoplias cazumba is distinguished from H. malabaricus by the lower number of dorsal-fin rays, number of caudal-fin rays, higher number of lateral-line scales and higher number of scales around caudal peduncle. A combination of several characters, especially number of pre-dorsal scale, number of lateral-line scales and number of vertebrae, can be used to distinguish H. cazumba from the congeners in the H. malabaricus species group.
The H. malabaricus group is one of the most intriguing Neotropical fish species complexes. Its complexity ranges from karyotypic overlaps in disjunct populations (
Despite the crucial role of molecular tools in uncovering cryptic species, some recent taxa in the H. malabaricus group have been described solely based on anatomical characters, like H. mbigua (
In our examination of multiple Hoplias specimens from various hydrographic basins in Maranhão, we identified not only H. cazumba but also H. malabaricus and putative new species from Itapecuru and Mearim basins (these new species are being described in an ongoing study by another research group).
Despite the increasing number of studies involving specimens from Maranhão, it is important to note that only
More recently, Conde-Saldaña et al. (2025), based on an analysis of 2,519 ultraconserved element (UCE) loci, recovered the monophyly of Erythrinidae genera and confirmed that H. malabaricus represents a broadly distributed species. However, their dataset did not include any samples from the hydrographic basins of Maranhão. These authors also suggested that the diversification and dispersal of species within the H. malabaricus complex intensified over the last 10 million years—coinciding with the timing of recent biogeographic events that drove freshwater fish diversification in Maranhão’s basins (
The Maranhão Hydrological Unit (MHU), located in the Eastern Amazon region, has been identified as a potential endemic area for freshwater fishes (Hubert and Renno 2006). Recent studies based on local scientific collections and the availability of new samples encouraged the discovery of new taxa in this region (
Recent studies have reaffirmed
| 1 | Last vertical series of scales on caudal-fin base curved | Hoplias misionera |
| – | Last vertical series of scales on caudal-fin base nearly straight | 2 |
| 2 | Five distinctive transverse brown bands on the lower jaw | H. mbigua |
| – | Color pattern of lower jaw lacking series of five brown bands | 3 |
| 3 | Lateral line scales 37–41 | 4 |
| – | Lateral line scales 41–47 | 7 |
| 4 | Dorsal-fin rays 11–13 | 5 |
| – | Dorsal-fin rays 14 | H. malabaricus |
| 5 | Pre-dorsal scales 14–17 | 6 |
| – | Pre-dorsal scales 18 | H. teres |
| 6 | Lateral line scales 37–39; anal-fin rays iii–iv, 7–8; caudal-fin rays ii–iv, 12–15; vertebrae 38–39 | H. auri |
| – | Lateral line scales 39–41; anal-fin rays i–ii, 8–10; caudal-fin rays ii, 15; vertebrae 39–41 | H. cazumba sp. nov. |
| 7 | Scales around caudal peduncle 20 | H. argentinensis |
| – | Scales around caudal peduncle 22–24 | H. microlepis |
The authors thank Carlos Lucena from Museu de Ciência e Tecnologia da PUC-RS (